Naut Astro

thedailywhat:

Dear Ann Coulter of the Day: After Ann Coulter referred to President Obama as a retard in a tweet during Monday night’s presidential debate, Special Olympics athlete and global messenger John Franklin Stephens penned her this open letter:
Dear Ann Coulter, Come on Ms. Coulter, you aren’t dumb and you aren’t shallow. So why are you continually using a word like the R-word as an insult? I’m a 30 year old man with Down syndrome who has struggled with the public’s perception that an intellectual disability means that I am dumb and shallow. I am not either of those things, but I do process information more slowly than the rest of you. In fact it has taken me all day to figure out how to respond to your use of the R-word last night. I thought first of asking whether you meant to describe the President as someone who was bullied as a child by people like you, but rose above it to find a way to succeed in life as many of my fellow Special Olympians have. Then I wondered if you meant to describe him as someone who has to struggle to be thoughtful about everything he says, as everyone else races from one snarkey sound bite to the next. Finally, I wondered if you meant to degrade him as someone who is likely to receive bad health care, live in low grade housing with very little income and still manages to see life as a wonderful gift. Because, Ms. Coulter, that is who we are – and much, much more. After I saw your tweet, I realized you just wanted to belittle the President by linking him to people like me. You assumed that people would understand and accept that being linked to someone like me is an insult and you assumed you could get away with it and still appear on TV. I have to wonder if you considered other hateful words but recoiled from the backlash. Well, Ms. Coulter, you, and society, need to learn that being compared to people like me should be considered a badge of honor. No one overcomes more than we do and still loves life so much. Come join us someday at Special Olympics. See if you can walk away with your heart unchanged. A friend you haven’t made yet, John Franklin Stephens Global Messenger Special Olympics Virginia
[specialolympicsblog]

thedailywhat:

Dear Ann Coulter of the Day: After Ann Coulter referred to President Obama as a retard in a tweet during Monday night’s presidential debate, Special Olympics athlete and global messenger John Franklin Stephens penned her this open letter:

Dear Ann Coulter, 

Come on Ms. Coulter, you aren’t dumb and you aren’t shallow. So why are you continually using a word like the R-word as an insult? 

I’m a 30 year old man with Down syndrome who has struggled with the public’s perception that an intellectual disability means that I am dumb and shallow. I am not either of those things, but I do process information more slowly than the rest of you. In fact it has taken me all day to figure out how to respond to your use of the R-word last night. 

I thought first of asking whether you meant to describe the President as someone who was bullied as a child by people like you, but rose above it to find a way to succeed in life as many of my fellow Special Olympians have. 

Then I wondered if you meant to describe him as someone who has to struggle to be thoughtful about everything he says, as everyone else races from one snarkey sound bite to the next. 

Finally, I wondered if you meant to degrade him as someone who is likely to receive bad health care, live in low grade housing with very little income and still manages to see life as a wonderful gift. 

Because, Ms. Coulter, that is who we are – and much, much more. 

After I saw your tweet, I realized you just wanted to belittle the President by linking him to people like me. You assumed that people would understand and accept that being linked to someone like me is an insult and you assumed you could get away with it and still appear on TV. 

I have to wonder if you considered other hateful words but recoiled from the backlash. 

Well, Ms. Coulter, you, and society, need to learn that being compared to people like me should be considered a badge of honor. 

No one overcomes more than we do and still loves life so much. 

Come join us someday at Special Olympics. See if you can walk away with your heart unchanged. 

A friend you haven’t made yet, John Franklin Stephens Global Messenger Special Olympics Virginia

[specialolympicsblog]


Barn party Saturday the 27

we went to a barn party at Chris and bob’s house today. josh, Al, Aaron, Andrew, Jackie, arsine people. Josh wants to make more music we had a great time playing with Al, mr. Meehan, josh. People loved the keyboard. Yay! Made iced tea with bubs and Henry, iced tea was scary and almost spilled everywhere (tazo passion tea with lemonade) and we had to put it in a bag. went to Jaffrey and donated e waste, for a five dollar subwoofer. hope it works, is an awesome Polk audio piece.

quinoa was really yum, bubs played galaxy trucker and loved it.

Also meet Brittany owner of the new bakery in town, and I also talked to sean about getting trombone lessons to little sean I’m excited!


Permaculture zone notes

Zone 0 - the house. This is where you spend the most time, so it includes the greenhouse attached to your house and the shade patio/outdoor kitchen.

Zone 1 - the garden right by the house and other things you use daily. This is the garden where you will spend the bulk of your time, and it should be right outside your door so you can pick from it all the time. This zone might also have a tool shed, small pond and some fruit trees depending on how big your property is. Water collection would help facilitate watering the garden.

Zone 2 - this is the area just beyond the perimeter of your kitchen garden. It is where you would keep your compost, and grow staples like potatoes or grains. You would keep chickens or ducks here. In the city this is probably as far as your property would extend.

Zone 3 - this is the area that you don’t have to go quite as often because it’s further away. The gardens here would be perennials, living mulches, windbreaks and firebreaks. You might keep some goats out here, and beehives. If you are growing a cash crop, this is where you would do it. It’s an area that you grow stuff in, but only stuff that uses up lots of space and takes less daily attention.

Zone 4 - this is your rural woodlot, edible forest garden, pig foraging, large pond area. This is where you can develop large tree plantings and long term projects.

Zone 5 - this is the wilderness. Even a small property should have a Zone 5, a small area that you simply allow to return to its natural state. It’s difficult to just not mess with it, but that’s the goal. This area helps you by attracting beneficial insects and allowing wild creatures a safe harbor rather than foraging in your garden.

Some people are a little confused about the difference between Zone 1 and 2. Zone 1 is really the perimeter of your house and only spans the space it takes to throw on some flip flops and meander through in five minutes. It should be as packed with edible plants as possible, and the more your grow here in every spare inch, the more time and effort you will save. This garden should be well mulched between plants and on pathways. Zone 2 is where the stinky stuff goes. On a small lot, you would grow some fruit trees here, possibly a hedge, and some edible shrubs like raspberries. This area would be mulched too, but everything is bigger and more spread out so it takes less attention to detail.


may 25 2012.

insurance shut me down for birth control, had to dish out 30+ bucks instead of 5 dollars. big pharma is all about money and not about taking care of people/ health 

got to see mason and friends today. we did really nice dream team shimmy hugs

jakob is a really talented bub when it comes to cameras- even if they cut him.

we took really lovely pictures in the park and saw the waterfalls

bubby ate egg rolls today and muffins. he relapsed from the gluten. but is now paying for it. made a pact so that he wont do this again.

we met a pomeranian that pees when approached. has a really hefty breathing pattern

PT 2 I am very glad that I separated professionally with D because I talked with S about it and found out more about his behavior. BUT I MIGHT GET TO DO PROJECT GRAD! Tomorrow I will call K and see about meeting her to talk about the event. I am excited and I feel like karma is paying me back!

I love Ann especially just being able to relax around her and work out our days. I hung out with James Miller and heard his really good music he’s been working on. Sounds like Flylo kinda and I want to meet with Riley soon too. Good day! Friday.

Tomorrow is a party at C and B’s place in Chesterfield. Excited for that! 


thepoliticalfreakshow:

Out of 178 nations, the U.S. is one of three that does not offer paid maternity leave benefits, let alone paid leave for fathers, which more than 50 of these nations offer.
 In comparison, Canada and Norway offer generous benefits that can be shared between the father and mother, France offers about four months, and even Mexico and Pakistan are among the nations offer 12 weeks paid leave for mothers.American women are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, which exempts companies with fewer than 50 paid employees, but in 2011, only 11 percent of private sector workers and 17 percent of public workers reported that they had access to paid maternity leave through their employer. And for first-time mothers, only about half can take paid leave when they give birth. At the same time that working women in the U.S. lack a benefit widely available across the globe, almost 50 percent of families had two working parents in 2010, and 26 percent of households were headed by single parents. Without guaranteed paid maternity leave, many of these working women face significant financial hardship by having to choose between their paycheck and their families. Women are forced to put their careers and financial future at risk simply because they want to have children. During their pregnancy, they face being fired unfairly or not being able to properly care for themselves. They should not have to worry about making ends meet without paid maternity leave on top of that.

thepoliticalfreakshow:

Out of 178 nations, the U.S. is one of three that does not offer paid maternity leave benefits, let alone paid leave for fathers, which more than 50 of these nations offer.

 In comparison, Canada and Norway offer generous benefits that can be shared between the father and mother, France offers about four months, and even Mexico and Pakistan are among the nations offer 12 weeks paid leave for mothers.

American women are offered 12 weeks of unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act, which exempts companies with fewer than 50 paid employees, but in 2011, only 11 percent of private sector workers and 17 percent of public workers reported that they had access to paid maternity leave through their employer. And for first-time mothers, only about half can take paid leave when they give birth.

At the same time that working women in the U.S. lack a benefit widely available across the globe, almost 50 percent of families had two working parents in 2010, and 26 percent of households were headed by single parents. Without guaranteed paid maternity leave, many of these working women face significant financial hardship by having to choose between their paycheck and their families.

Women are forced to put their careers and financial future at risk simply because they want to have children. During their pregnancy, they face being fired unfairly or not being able to properly care for themselves. They should not have to worry about making ends meet without paid maternity leave on top of that.


xezene:

“When my husband died, because he was so famous and known  for not being a believer, many people would come up to me — it still  sometimes happens — and ask me if Carl changed at the end &  converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I  think I will see him again.
Carl faced his death with unflagging courage  and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we  would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited  with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for  nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and  precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by  pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single  moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous - not  miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were  beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so  kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in  Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time…  That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which  sustains me and it’s much more meaningful…
The way he treated me  and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our  family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I  will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw  him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was  wonderful.”
Ann Druyan, about her husband Carl Sagan
xezene:

“When my husband died, because he was so famous and known  for not being a believer, many people would come up to me — it still  sometimes happens — and ask me if Carl changed at the end &  converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I  think I will see him again.
Carl faced his death with unflagging courage  and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we  would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited  with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for  nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and  precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by  pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single  moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous - not  miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were  beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so  kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in  Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time…  That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which  sustains me and it’s much more meaningful…
The way he treated me  and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our  family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I  will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw  him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was  wonderful.”
Ann Druyan, about her husband Carl Sagan

xezene:

“When my husband died, because he was so famous and known for not being a believer, many people would come up to me — it still sometimes happens — and ask me if Carl changed at the end & converted to a belief in an afterlife. They also frequently ask me if I think I will see him again.

Carl faced his death with unflagging courage and never sought refuge in illusions. The tragedy was that we knew we would never see each other again. I don’t ever expect to be reunited with Carl. But, the great thing is that when we were together, for nearly twenty years, we lived with a vivid appreciation of how brief and precious life is. We never trivialized the meaning of death by pretending it was anything other than a final parting. Every single moment that we were alive and we were together was miraculous - not miraculous in the sense of inexplicable or supernatural. We knew we were beneficiaries of chance… That pure chance could be so generous and so kind… That we could find each other, as Carl wrote so beautifully in Cosmos, you know, in the vastness of space and the immensity of time… That we could be together for twenty years. That is something which sustains me and it’s much more meaningful…

The way he treated me and the way I treated him, the way we took care of each other and our family, while he lived. That is so much more important than the idea I will see him someday. I don’t think I’ll ever see Carl again. But I saw him. We saw each other. We found each other in the cosmos, and that was wonderful.”

Ann Druyan, about her husband Carl Sagan